Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Is it really necessary to do the Bane/Bain thing?

I doubt if Rush reads comic books (and I stopped reading them decades ago when they changed from wholesome entertainment to crap), so he didn't originate this Bane/Bain thing.

And you can wonder, I suppose, why movie writers would resurrect the character of Bane (created in the comic books many, many years ago) in time for a movie to come out in 2012 - regardless of the fact that no one knew he'd get t he nominee-ship until three months or so ago..

Anyway, Rush ended his monologue about it with this:
But, anyway, I didn't really know what the point of this story is.  They're trying to point out that in Batman the good guy and the rich guy are one and the same, and that's Bruce Wayne.  And so what this guy is saying here, hey, instead of falling in with the evil guy being Bane, let's just say Batman is Romney.  Batman's Romney, he's the evil rich guy, he's the good rich guy, he's out to save New York.  The rich guy's the good guy.  Of course the evil guy is always rich too in these Batman movies.  You may think it's ridiculous, I'm just telling you this is the kind of stuff the Obama team is lining up. The kind of people who would draw this comparison are the kind of people that they are campaigning to.  These are the kind of people that they are attempting to appeal to.

No comments:

Post a Comment