Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Rush Accuses Paterno Of Being Afraid of the "Gay Agenda"

Edited to add Sandusky timeline:
Jerry Sandusky retired as assistant coach at Penn State in 1999. He was allowed to continue to use the team's facilities, bringing kids from his Second Mile Charity, apparently.

"According to the indictment, in 2002 assistant coach Mike McQueary, then a Penn State graduate assistant, walked in on Sandusky having anal intercourse with a ten-year-old boy. The next day, he reported the incident to Paterno, who informed Curley. Ultimately, the only action Curley and Schultz took was to order Sandusky not to bring any children from Second Mile to the football building, an action that was approved by school president Graham Spanier. The indictment accused Curley and Schultz not only of failing to tell the police, but also of falsely telling the grand jury that McQueary never informed them of sexual activity."
No, he didnt' come right out and say it, but he implied it.

Shame on you, Rush!

Joe Paterno is going to be forced out at Penn State because he did nothing to keep ex-Assistant Coach Jerry Sandusky from raping small boys over the course of a decade (by taking steps in 2002 to bring Sandusky's actions to the knowledge of the police.). A couple of Penn State officials are going to go on trial for perjury in the case.

Rush said today that the reason no one did anything to stop Sandusky was:

Rush on the Degradatoin of American CultureRUSH: Look... (interruption) You know, if I really wanted to retire today I could answer you in a way that would end my career. Well, of course I'm therefore not gonna say it. Lawrence, I just want to say one thing to you. While you're perfectly within bounds to go after "the elites protecting themselves," Democrats do that. But why? There is a part of this story -- it's glaring; it's right in front of everybody -- and nobody's got the guts to say it. Nobody, including me. I don't have the guts to bring it up. Nobody does.

CALLER: What's that?

RUSH: Nobody has the guts to actually give the explanation for what was going on and why there was trepidation in reporting it, and that's all I'll say. If you can figure it out on your own, fine and dandy.

Just what is he talking about? Does he think that if Paterno had brought Sandusky's actions not to the University but to the Police, he would have been hounded by gays saying, "Hey, there's nothing wrong with a 60 year old man having sex with an 8 year old boy."

No - the homosexual community would have done nothing of the kind. They know rape when they see it, too.

Men - and women - who have sex with minors go to jail all the time. Does Rush never watch Law and Order: SVU? Sure, most of the victims on that show are white females, but they've done lots of child molestation stories in the 20 years of the shows existence...and no one ever defends a child molester. (Yeah, they get in cracks about the Catholic church and how the church protected dozens of male priest-molesters for decades...are Catholics afraid of the "gay agenda" too?) For that matter - has anyone in the gay community ever come out (no pun intended) and defended these Catholic church pedophiles? No!

So why should Penn State have been afraid of it?

And what is Rush trying to say, anyway? That grown men, men of stature at Penn State, will let little boys be raped because they're afraid of what a few gays will say? When everyone knows that everybody hates child molesters? They were afraid that the gay agenda would be more powerful than the shock and anger of the entire country?

Did Rush just call Joe Paterno a coward?
__________
My Schedule of Regular Posts:
*Monday through Friday morning - schedules of President, VP and Secretary of State and her diplomats*
Monday through Friday afternoon - List of topics Limbaugh discussed on his program that day
*Monday through Friday throughout the day - My posts on anything that I feel like talking about. At least one or two a day, sometimes more.
*Saturday through Sunday morning - An addition to my booklist of political books - covering Democrats, Republicans and other interested parties
.

No comments:

Post a Comment